The whole post is two sentences and it is quoted here in full: “Revival is proud to unveil the faze partners logo. This logo was designed for a friend of ours who’s really out to change stuff in Ghana, just keep your ears and eyes on the street for them.” It names no designer and carries no labels, so this page has no Team row and no Software row, and it gives no city beyond the Ghana the post itself names.
The client is known only through the mark. The post is titled FAZE PARTNERS LOGO while the listing is called Faze Partners, because that is what the wordmark spells: the two words run together with no space, and nothing in the source gives a longer company name, a contact or a sector.
The mark is a group of four figures — round heads over rounded-shoulder bodies that taper to flat feet — set at four different heights and close enough together that the group also reads as a rising bar chart. A single line runs out from beneath their feet to the right, thick at its middle and tapering to a point at each end. Below it the name is set in a humanist sans: Faze in grey, Partners in blue, and the whole wordmark mirrored faintly under itself.
The first frame is the presentation sheet: the lockup centred on a white field, with a solid blue band across the bottom edge carrying the same four figures reversed out in white at its left. The second is an application rather than a drawing — the lockup again reversed in white, set at the lower left of a blue field built from a grid of soft rounded squares that brightens above the mark and deepens to teal toward the edges.
Nothing in the post dates one frame against the other. The second file is named fazenew, which is the only hint of an order between them, and a filename is not a statement, so both are published here as the single reveal the studio put up: the sheet and the wallpaper made from it.
On the sizes. The sheet is 1131 x 1600 px, the largest copy of it anywhere public. The wallpaper is 252 x 145 px, and that is its own size rather than a thumbnail: every rendition size the blog’s image host is asked for returns the identical 53,486-byte file, so nothing larger is held there, and the studio’s own archive on this machine holds no Faze Partners folder. The wallpaper is therefore shown at its native size and is not enlarged.
The post went up on 19 June 2009 under the name the studio used then, Revival, on its own blog, and the work is listed here as 2009. No tagline, colour specification or further application was published with the job, so this listing carries the mark and the one application the studio showed.
Sources: both frames and the quoted sentence are published by the studio on its own blog.